Paper detail

Radio Number for the Cartesian Product of Two Trees

Let $G$ be a simple connected graph. For any two vertices $u$ and $v$, let $d(u,v)$ denote the distance between $u$ and $v$ in $G$, and let $diam(G)$ denote the diameter of $G$. A radio-labeling of $G$ is a function $f$ which assigns to each vertex a non-negative integer (label) such that for every distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ in $G$, it holds that $|f(u)-f(v)| \geq diam(G) - d(u,v) +1$. The span of $f$ is the difference between the largest and smallest labels of $f(V)$. The radio number of $G$, denoted by $rn(G)$, is the smallest span of a radio labeling admitted by $G$. In this paper, we give a lower bound for the radio number of the Cartesian product of two trees. Moreover, we present three necessary and sufficient conditions, and three sufficient conditions for the product of two trees to achieve this bound. Applying these results, we determine the radio number of the Cartesian product of two stars as well as a path and a star.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.