Paper detail

Radiative transfer simulations for in-situ particle size diagnostic in reactive, particle growing plasmas

When considering particles produced in reactive plasmas, their basic properties, such as refractive index and grain size often need to be known. They can be constrained both ex-situ, e.g., by microscopy, and in-situ by polarimetry, i.e., analyzing the polarization state of scattered light. Polarimetry has the advantage of temporal resolution and real-time measurement, but the analysis is often limited by the assumption of single scattering and thus optically thin dust clouds. This limits the investigation of the growth process typically to grain sizes smaller than about 200 nm. Using 3D polarized radiative transfer simulations, however, it is possible to consider multiple scattering and to analyze the properties of dense particle clouds. We study the impact of various properties of dust clouds on the scattering polarization, namely the optical depth of the cloud, the spatial density distribution of the particles, their refractive index as well as the particle size dispersion. We find that ambiguities can occur regarding optical depth and spatial density distribution as well as regarding refractive index and particle size dispersion. Determining the refractive index correctly is especially important as it has a strong impact on the derived particle sizes. With this knowledge, we are able to design an in-situ diagnostics strategy for the investigation of the particle growth process based on radiative transfer simulations which are used to model the polarization over the whole growth process. The application of this strategy allows us for the first time to analyze the polarization measured during a growth experiment in a reactive argon-acetylene plasma for particle radii up to 280 nm.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.