Paper detail

Radiative Spectra from Disk Corona and Inner Hot Flow in Black Hole X-ray Binaries

To understand the origin of hard X-ray emissions from black hole X-ray binaries during their low/hard states, we calculate the X-ray spectra of black-hole accretion flow for the following three configurations of hot and cool media: (a) an inner hot flow and a cool outer disk (inner hot flow model), (b) a cool disk sandwiched by disk coronae (disk corona model), and (c) the combination of those two (hybrid model). The basic features we require for successful models are (i) significant hard X-ray emission whose luminosity exceeds that of soft X-rays, (ii) high hard X-ray luminosities in the range of (0.4 - 30) times 10^{37} erg s^{-1}, and (iii) the existence of two power-law components in the hard X-ray band with the photon indices of Gamma_s ~ 2 > Gamma_h, where Gamma_s and Gamma_h are the photon indices of the softer (<10 keV) and the harder (>10 keV) power-law components, respectively. Contribution by non-thermal electrons nor time-dependent evolution are not considered. We find that Models (a) and (b) can be ruled out, since the spectra are always dominated by the soft component, and since only one power-law component, at most, can be reproduced. Only Model (c) can account for sufficiently strong hard X-ray emissions, as well as the existence of the two power-law components, for a large ratio of the accretion rate in the corona to that in the thin disk. The outer disk corona (where the Compton y-parameter is smaller, y < 1) produces the softer power-law component with photon index of Gamma_s ~ 2, whereas the inner hot flow (where y gtrsim 1) generates the harder component with Gamma_h < 2. This model can also account for the observed relationship between the photon index and the reflection fraction.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.