Paper detail

Radiative signature of magnetic fields in internal shocks

Common models of blazars and gamma-ray bursts assume that the plasma underlying the ob- served phenomenology is magnetized to some extent. Within this context, radiative signatures of dissipation of kinetic and conversion of magnetic energy in internal shocks of relativistic magnetized outflows are studied. We model internal shocks as being caused by collisions of homogeneous plasma shells. We compute the flow state after the shell interaction by solving Riemann problems at the contact surface between the colliding shells, and then compute the emission from the resulting shocks. Under the assumption of a constant flow luminosity we find that there is a clear difference between the models where both shells are weakly magne- tized (σ<\sim0.01) and those where, at least, one shell has a σ>\sim0.01. We obtain that the radiative efficiency is largest for models in which, regardless of the ordering, one shell is weakly and the other strongly magnetized. Substantial differences between weakly and strongly magne- tized shell collisions are observed in the inverse-Compton part of the spectrum, as well as in the optical, X-ray and 1GeV light curves. We propose a way to distinguish observationally between weakly magnetized from magnetized internal shocks by comparing the maximum frequency of the inverse-Compton and synchrotron part of the spectrum to the ratio of the inverse-Compton and synchrotron fluence. Finally, our results suggest that LBL blazars may correspond to barely magnetized flows, while HBL blazars could correspond to moderately magnetized ones. Indeed, by comparing with actual blazar observations we conclude that the magnetization of typical blazars is σ <\sim 0.01 for the internal shock model to be valid in these sources.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.