Paper detail

Radiative neutrino mass model from a mass dimension-11 $ΔL =2 $ effective operator

We present the first detailed phenomenological analysis of a radiative Majorana neutrino mass model constructed from opening up a $ΔL = 2$ mass-dimension-11 effective operator constructed out of standard model fields. While three such operators are generated, only one dominates neutrino mass generation, namely $O_{47} = \overline{L^C} L \overline{Q^C} Q \overline{Q} Q^C H H$, where $L$ denotes lepton doublet, $Q$ quark doublet and $H$ Higgs doublet. The underlying renormalisable theory contains the scalars $S_1 \sim (\bar{3},1,1/3)$ coupling as a diquark, $S_3 \sim (\bar{3},3,1/3)$ coupling as a leptoquark, and $Φ_3 \sim (3,3,2/3)$, which has no Yukawa couplings but does couple to $S_1$ and $S_3$ in addition to the gauge fields. Neutrino masses and mixings are generated at two-loop order. A feature of this model that is different from many other radiative models is the lack of proportionality to any quark and charged-lepton masses of the neutrino mass matrix. One consequence is that the scale of new physics can be as high as $10^7$ TeV, despite the operator having a high mass dimension. This raises the prospect that $ΔL = 2$ effective operators at even higher mass dimensions may, when opened up, produce phenomenologically-viable radiative neutrino mass models. The parameter space of the model is explored through benchmark slices that are subject to experimental constraints from charged lepton flavour-violating decays, rare meson decays and neutral-meson mixing. The acceptable parameter space can accommodate the anomalies in $R_{K^{(*)}}$ and the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.