Paper detail

Radiative hydrodynamics simulations of red supergiant stars. IV gray versus non-gray opacities

Red supergiants are massive evolved stars that contribute extensively to the chemical enrichment of our Galaxy. It has been shown that convection in those stars gives rise to large granules that cause surface inhomogeneities and shock waves in the photosphere. The understanding of their dynamics is crucial to unveil the unknown mass-loss mechanism, their chemical composition and stellar parameters. We present a new generation of red supergiants simulations with a more sophisticated opacity treatment done with 3D radiative- hydrodynamics CO5BOLD. In the code, the coupled equations of compressible hydrodynamics and non-local radiation transport are solved in the presence of a spherical potential. The stellar core is replaced by a special spherical inner boundary condition, where the gravitational potential is smoothed and the energy production by fusion is mimicked by a simply producing heat corresponding to the stellar luminosity. The post-processing radiative transfer code OPTIM3D is used to extract spectroscopic and interferometric observables. We show that the relaxation of the assumption of frequency-independent opacities shows a steeper mean thermal gradient in the optical thin region that affect strongly the atomic strengths and the spectral energy distribution. Moreover, the weaker temperature fluctuations reduce the incertitude on the radius determination with interferometry. We show that 1D models of red supergiants must include a turbulent velocity calibrated on 3D simulations to obtain the effective surface gravity that mimic the effect of turbulent pressure on the stellar atmosphere. We provide an empirical calibration of the ad-hoc micro- and macroturbulence parameters for 1D models using the 3D simulations: we find that there is not a clear distinction between the different macroturbulent profiles needed in 1D models to fit 3D synthetic lines.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.