Paper detail

Radiation-reaction-induced transitions of two maximally entangled atoms in non-inertial motion

We apply the DDC formalism [proposed by Dalibard, Dupont-Roc and Cohen-Tannoudji] to study the average rate of change of energy of two identical two-level atoms interacting with the vacuum massless scalar field in synchronized motion along stationary trajectories. By separating the contributions of vacuum fluctuations and atomic radiation reaction, we first show that for the two-atom system initially prepared in the factorizable eigenstates $|g_Ag_B\rangle$ and $|e_Ae_B\rangle$, where $g$ and $e$ represent the ground state and the excited state of a single atom respectively, both vacuum fluctuations and atomic radiation reaction contribute to the average rate of change of energy of the two-atom system, and the contribution of vacuum fluctuations is independent of the interatomic separation while that of atomic radiation reaction is dependent on it. This is contrary to the existing results in the literature where vacuum fluctuations are interatomic-separation dependent. However, if the two-atom system is initially prepared in the unfactorizable symmetric/antisymmetric entangled state, the average rate of change of energy of the two-atom system is never perturbed by the vacuum fluctuations, but is totally a result of the atomic radiation reaction. We then consider two special cases of motion of the two-atom system which is initially prepared in the symmetric/antisymmetric entangled state, i.e., synchronized inertial motion and synchronized uniform acceleration. In contrast to the average rate of change of energy of a single uniformly accelerated atom, the average rate of change of energy of the uniformly accelerated two-atom system is nonthermal-like. The effects of noninertial motion on the transitions of states of the two correlated atoms are also discussed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.