Paper detail

Radiation Mechanisms and Physical Properties of GeV-TeV BL Lac Objects

Broadband spectral energy distributions (SEDs) are complied from literature for 24 TeV BL Lac objects. Two SEDs, which are identified as low and high states with their flux densities at $1\ {\rm TeV}$ ($F_{1 TeV}$), are available for each of 11 objects. We fit the SEDs with the single-zone synchrotron + synchrotron-self-Compton (SSC) model and determine the physical parameters of the jets. The model well represents the SEDs, and the observed relation between two peak frequencies $ν_{\rm s}$ and $ν_{\rm c}$ also favors the model. It is found that the break of the electron spectrum ($γ_{\rm b}$) is different among sources, but magnetic field strength distributes narrowly in $0.1-0.6 $ G, indicating that the shocks in the jets are significantly different among sources and the magnetic field may be independent of the shocks. The ratio of $F_{1 TeV}$ is correlated with the ratio of the $γ_{\rm b}$ in the low and high states, indicating that the relativistic shocks in the jets may be responsible for the observed flux variations and the spectral shift. The ratio of the two peak luminosities $L_{\rm c}/L_{\rm s}$ is anti-correlated with $ν_{\rm s}$ in the co-moving frame, which is possibly due to the Klein-Nishina effect. No excess in the GeV band due to the interaction between the TeV photons and the extragalactic background light is observed, implying that the strength of the intergalactic magnetic field would be much larger than $ 10^{-16}$ G. An anti-correlation between jet power and the mass of the central black hole is observed, i.e., $P_{\rm jet}\propto M^{-1}_{\rm BH}$, disfavoring the scenario of a pure accretion-driven jet. We suggest that the spin energy extraction may be significant for powering jets in these sources, implying that the black holes with smaller mass may spin more rapidly.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.