Paper detail

Radiation gasdynamics of planetary nebulae -- VI. The evolution of aspherical planetary nebulae

This paper reports the results of the numerical study of the formation of aspherical Planetary Nebulae through the Generalised Interacting Winds Model, taking into account the effects caused by the evolving central star and fast wind. The results show for the first time that aspherical nebulae do form within the required time scale. Consideration of the development of the nebula shows that in the early stages it is the ionization of the aspherical AGB wind that contributes considerably to the shaping of the nebula. Furthermore the passing through of the ionization front may modifies the density distribution in the slow wind, leading to the formation of a surrounding envelope, and sometimes a different morphology for the nebula than was to be expected from the initial conditions. I consider how the different phases of ionization fronts and wind swept bubbles can be observationally distinguished.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.