Paper detail

Radiation from a $D$-dimensional collision of gravitational shock waves

Classically, if two highly boosted particles collide head-on, a black hole is expected to form whose mass may be inferred from the gravitational radiation emitted during the collision. If this occurs at trans-Planckian energies, it should be well described by general relativity. Furthermore, if there exist hidden extra dimensions, the fundamental Planck mass may well be of the order of the TeV and thus achievable with current or future particle accelerators. By modeling the colliding particles as Aichelburg-Sexl shock waves on a flat, $D$-dimensional background, we devise a perturbative framework to compute the space-time metric in the future of the collision. Then, a generalisation of Bondi's formalism is employed to extract the gravitational radiation and compute the inelasticity of the collision: the percentage of the initial centre-of-mass energy that is radiated away. Using the axial symmetry of the problem, we show that this information is encoded in a single function of the transverse metric components - the news function. We then unveil a hidden conformal symmetry which exists at each order in perturbation theory and thus makes the problem effectively two-dimensional. Moreover, it allows for the factorisation of the angular dependence of the news function, i.e. the radiation pattern at null infinity, and clarifies the correspondence between the perturbative series of the metric and an angular expansion off the collision axis. The first-order estimate, or isotropic term, is computed analytically and yields a remarkable simple formula for the inelasticity for any $D$. Higher-order terms, however, require the use of a computer for numerical integration. We study the integration domain and compute, numerically, the Green's functions and the sources, thus paving the way for the computation of the inelasticity in a future work.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.