Paper detail

Radially Symmetric Non-isentropic Euler flows: continuous blowup with positive pressure

Guderley's 1942 work on radial shock waves provides cases of self-similar Euler flows exhibiting blowup of primary (undifferentiated) flow variables: a converging shock wave invades a quiescent region, and the velocity and pressure in its immediate wake become unbounded at time of collapse. However, these solutions are of border-line physicality: the pressure vanishes within the quiescent region due to vanishing temperature there. It is reasonable that the lack of upstream counter-pressure is conducive to large speeds, with concomitant large amplitudes. Based on Guderley's original solutions it is therefore unclear if it is the zero-pressure region that is responsible for blowup. The same applies to self-similar Euler flows describing radial cavity flow, first analyzed by Hunter (1960). Recent works have shown that the simplified isothermal and isentropic models admit continuous blowup solutions in the presence of a strictly positive pressure field. In this work we extend this conclusion to the case of the full Euler system. The solutions under consideration are radial self-similar flows in which a continuous wave focuses and blows up. We propagate the solutions beyond blowup and observe numerically that there are cases where an expanding spherical shock wave is generated at collapse. The resulting solution has the unusual property that the flow is isentropic in each of the two regions separated by the shock. We finally verify that these are admissible global weak solutions to the full, multi-d compressible Euler system.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.