Paper detail

Radial velocity photon limits for the dwarf stars of spectral classes F--M

The determination of extrasolar planet masses with the radial velocity (RV) technique requires spectroscopic Doppler information from the planet's host star, which varies with stellar brightness and temperature. We analyze Doppler information in spectra of F--M dwarfs utilizing empirical information from HARPS and CARMENES, and from model spectra. We come to the conclusions that an optical setup ($BVR$-bands) is more efficient that a near-infrared one ($YJHK$) in dwarf stars hotter than 3200\,K. We publish a catalogue of 46,480 well-studied F--M dwarfs in the solar neighborhood and compare their distribution to more than one million stars from Gaia DR2. For all stars, we estimate the RV photon noise achievable in typical observations assuming no activity jitter and slow rotation. We find that with an ESPRESSO-like instrument at an 8m-telescope, a photon noise limit of 10\,cm\,s$^{-1}$ or lower can be reached in more than 280 stars in a 5\,min observation. At 4m-telescopes, a photon noise limit of 1\,m\,s$^{-1}$ can be reached in a 10\,min exposure in approx.\ 10,000 predominantly sun-like stars with a HARPS-like (optical) instrument. The same applies to $\sim$3000 stars for a red-optical setup covering the $RIz$-bands, and to $\sim$700 stars for a near-infrared instrument. For the latter two, many of the targets are nearby M dwarfs. Finally, we identify targets in which Earth-mass planets within the liquid water habitable zone can cause RV amplitudes comparable to the RV photon noise. Assuming the same exposure times, we find that an ESPRESSO-like instrument can reach this limit for 1\,M$_\Earth$ planets in more than 1000 stars. The optical, red-optical, and near-infrared configurations reach the limit for 2\,M$_\Earth$ planets in approximately 500, 700, and 200 stars, respectively.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.