Paper detail

Radial hopper flow prediction using a constitutive model with microstructure evolution

We present theoretical predictions of granular flow in a conical hopper based on a continuum theory employing a recently-developed constitutive model with microstructure evolution by Sun and Sundaresan [1]. The model is developed for strain rate-independent granular flows. The closures for the pressure and the macroscopic friction coefficient are linked to microstructure through evolution equations for the coordination number and fabric. The material constants in the model are functions of particle-level properties. A salient prediction is the variable stress ratio along the flow direction, in contrast to the constant ratio employed in some widely-used plasticity theories, but supported by results obtained from discrete element simulations. The model permits direct interrogation of the influence of particle-particle friction as well as normal-stress differences on the stress distribution and discharge rate. Increasing particle friction leads to higher stress ratios, but lower normal stress and flow rates, while considering normal-stress differences results in the opposite effects.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.