Paper detail

Radial Acceleration Relation between Baryons and Dark or Phantom Matter in the Super-critical Acceleration Regime of Nearly Spherical Galaxies

The central regions of nearby elliptical galaxies are dominated by baryons (stars) and provide interesting laboratories for studying the radial acceleration relation (RAR). We carry out exploratory analyses and discuss the possibility of constraining the RAR in the super-critical acceleration range $(10^{-9.5},\hspace{1ex}10^{-8})$~${\rm m}~{\rm s}^{-2}$ using a sample of nearly round pure-bulge (spheroidal, dispersion-dominated) galaxies including 24 ATLAS$^{\rm 3D}$ galaxies and 4201 SDSS galaxies covering a wide range of masses, sizes and luminosity density profiles. We consider a range of current possibilities for the stellar mass-to-light ratio ($M_\star/L$), its gradient and dark or phantom matter (DM/PM) halo profiles. We obtain the probability density functions (PDFs) of the parameters of the considered models via Bayesian inference based on spherical Jeans Monte Carlo modeling of the observed velocity dispersions. We then constrain the DM/PM-to-baryon acceleration ratio $a_{\rm X}/a_{\rm B}$ from the PDFs. Unless we ignore observed radial gradients in $M_\star/L$, or assume unreasonably strong gradients, marginalization over nuisance factors suggests $a_{\rm X}/a_{\rm B} = 10^{p} (a_{\rm B}/a_{+1})^q$ with $p = -1.00 \pm 0.03$ (stat) $^{+0.11}_{-0.06}$ (sys) and $q=-1.02 \pm 0.09$ (stat) $^{+0.16}_{-0.00}$ (sys) around a super-critical acceleration $a_{+1}\equiv 1.2\times 10^{-9}~{\rm m}~{\rm s}^{-2}$. In the context of the $Λ$CDM paradigm, this RAR suggests that the NFW DM halo profile is a reasonable description of galactic halos even after the processes of galaxy formation and evolution. In the context of the MOND paradigm, this RAR favors the Simple interpolating function but is inconsistent with the vast majority of other theoretical proposals and fitting functions motivated mainly from sub-critical acceleration data.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.