Paper detail

R-M interactions in R2BaMO5 (R=Y or Gd and M=Cu or Zn)

R2BaMO5 (R = Gd, Y and M = Cu, Zn) oxides have been studied by specific heat, dc magnetic susceptibility, and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). For one member of the series without magnetic moment at M, namely Gd2BaZnO5, measurements reveal long range antiferromagnetic order at TN(Gd2BaZnO5) = 2.3(0.1)K, much lower than the Curie Weiss temperature of Θ=15.9(0.3)K. This indicates the existence of competing interactions that introduce a large degree of magnetic frustration in the system. For Y2BaCuO5 the Cu Cu interactions are responsible for the broad maximum in the magnetic contribution to the specific heat centered at 18.5(0.01)K that stretches beyond the instrumental limit of 25K. The strong Cu Cu interactions also present in Gd2BaCuO5, combined with the Gd-Cu interaction, polarize the Gd sublattice giving measurable contributions to the specific heat in the same temperature range. In addition, they broaden the Gd EPR line and saturate its integrated intensity. The ordering temperature of Gd ions is raised to TN(Gd2BaCuO5)=12.0(0.1)K.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.