Paper detail

r-Dynamic Chromatic Number of Graphs

An $r$-dynamic $k$-coloring of a graph $G$ is a proper vertex $k$-coloring such that the neighbors of any vertex $v$ receive at least $\min\{r,{\rm deg}(v)\}$ different colors. The $r$-dynamic chromatic number of $G$, $χ_r(G)$, is defined as the smallest $k$ such that $G$ admits an $r$-dynamic $k$-coloring. In this paper we introduce an upper bound for $χ_r(G)$ in terms of $r$, chromatic number, maximum degree and minimum degree. In 2001, Montgomery \cite{MR2702379} conjectured that, for a $d$-regular graph $G$, $χ_2(G)-χ(G)\leq 2$. In this regard, for a $d$-regular graph $G$, we present two upper bounds for $χ_2(G)-χ(G)$, one of them, $\lceil 5.437\log d+2.721\rceil$, is an improvement of the bound $14.06\log d +1$, proved by Alishahi (2011) \cite{MR2746973}. Also, we give an upper bound for $χ_2(G)$ in terms of chromatic number, maximum degree and minimum degree.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.