Paper detail

$R_b$ and $R_c$ in the Two Higgs Doublet Model with Flavor Changing Neutral Currents

A study of $R_b$ and $R_c$ is presented in the context of a Two Higgs Doublet Model (2HDM) with flavor changing scalar currents (FCSC). Implications of the model for the $ρ$-parameter and for $b\to sγ$ are also considered. The experimental data on $R_b$ places stringent constraints on the model parameters. The configuration of the model needed to account for $R_b$ is found to be irreconcilable with constraints from $b\to sγ$ and $ρ$. In particular, if $R^{\rm exp}_b>R^{\sss{\rm SM}}_b$ persists then this version of 2HDM will be ruled out or require significant modifications. Noting that aspects of the experimental analysis for $R_b$ and $R_c$ may be of some concern, we also disregard $R^{\rm exp}_b$ and $R^{\rm exp}_c$ and give predictions for these using constraints from $b\to sγ$ and $ρ$ parameter only. We emphasize the theoretical and experimental advantages of the observable $R_{b+c}\equiv Γ(Z\to b\bar b\mbox{ or } c\bar c)/Γ(Z\to\mbox{hadrons})$. We also stress the role of $R_\ell\equiv Γ(Z\to\mbox{hadrons})/Γ(Z\to \ell^+\ell^-)$ in testing the Standard Model (SM) despite its dependence on QCD corrections. Noting that in models with FCNC the amplitude for $Z\to c\bar c$ receives a contribution which grows with $m^2_t$, the importance and uniqueness of precision $Z\to c\bar c$ measurements for constraining flavor changing $t\bar c$ currents is underscored.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.