Paper detail

$ξR ϕ^2$ coupling, cosmological constant and quantum gravitational correction to Newton's potential

This letter investigates the contribution of the $\sqrt{-g}ξRϕ^2$ interaction to the long range gravitational potential for massive scalar fields, from the non-relativistic limit of the 2-2 scattering amplitude with graviton exchanges. Such coupling is naturally motivated from the renormalisation of a scalar field theory with quartic self interaction in a curved spacetime. This is qualitatively different from the minimal ones like $ \sqrt{G} h^{μν}T_{μν}$, as the vertices corresponding to the former do not explicitly contain any scalar momenta, but instead explicitly contains the momentum carried by graviton line. For the minimal vertex, the long range gravitational potential up to one loop $({\cal O}(G), {\cal O}(G^2))$ was obtained earlier from the terms non-analytic in the transfer momentum, $q^{-2},\ q^{-1},\ \ln q^2 $, yielding potentials respectively like $r^{-1}$, $r^{-2}$, $r^{-3}$. However owing to the aforesaid explicit appearance of transfer momentum for the non-minimal vertices, the leading contribution in this case comes at ${\cal O}(ξG^2)$, and turns out to be subleading compared to even $r^{-3}$. To complement this `screening' effect, we consider the three graviton vertex generated by the $\sim Λ\sqrt{-g}/G$ term in the action, where $Λ$ is the cosmological constant. This vertex does not explicitly contain any graviton momentum. With this vertex, and assuming short scale scattering much small compared to the Hubble horizon, we compute the seagull, the vacuum polarisation and the fish diagrams and obtain the 2-2 scattering amplitudes. The leading gravitational potential at ${\cal O}(ξΛG^2 )$ behaves like $ r^{-1}$, even though it is much subleading compared to Newton's potential due to the appearance of $Λ$. We also discuss the scenario where this potential dominates the aforesaid ${\cal O}(ξG^2)$ one.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.