Paper detail

Quintic-scaling rank-reduced coupled cluster theory with single and double excitations

We consider the rank-reduced coupled-cluster theory with single and double excitations (RR-CCSD) introduced recently [Parrish \emph{et al.}, J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 150}, 164118 (2019)]. The main feature of this method is the decomposed form of the doubly-excited amplitudes which are expanded in the basis of largest magnitude eigenvectors of the MP2 or MP3 amplitudes. This approach enables a substantial compression of the amplitudes with only minor loss of accuracy. However, the formal scaling of the computational costs with the system size ($N$) is unaffected in comparison with the conventional CCSD theory ($\propto N^6$) due to presence of some terms quadratic in the amplitudes. We show how to solve this problem, exploiting the fact that their effective rank increases only linearly with the system size and reduce the scaling of the RR-CCSD iterations down to the level of $N^5$. This is combined with an iterative method of finding dominant eigenpairs of the MP2 or MP3 amplitudes which eliminates the necessity to perform the complete diagonalization. Next, we consider the evaluation of the perturbative corrections to the CCSD energies resulting from triply excited configurations. The triply-excited amplitudes present in the CCSD(T) method are decomposed to the Tucker-3 format using the higher-order orthogonal iteration (HOOI) procedure. This enables to compute the energy correction due to triple excitations non-iteratively with $N^6$ cost. The accuracy of the resulting rank-reduced CCSD(T) method is studied both for total and relative correlation energies of a diverse set of molecules. Accuracy levels better than 99.9\% can be achieved with a substantial reduction of the computational costs. Concerning the computational timings, break-even point between the rank-reduced and conventional CCSD implementations occurs for systems with about $30-40$ active electrons.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.