Paper detail

Questioning the 239Pu(n,2n)238Pu cross section shape above emission threshold

In the light of the JEF(F) European project longstanding story according to the determination of the most exact shape of the 239Pu(n, 2n)238Pu reaction cross section and a recent measurement by Meot et al., this paper aims to shed another light on this topic by bringing new theoretical feedback. To achieve this goal, the AVXSF-LNG computer program has been upgraded to model second-chance reactions using its decay-probability module and, then chained to the TALYS-ECIS06 nuclear reaction system of codes. Present diligent calculation of the (n,2n) cross section over the energy range from the threshold to the onset of third-chance fission at about 12 MeV, suggests that current evaluations under-estimate the 239Pu(n,2n) cross section below 10 MeV; under-estimation of the order of 7% relatively to the JEFF-3.1 evaluation. On this ground, we propose an upward correction to the normalization of the measurement by Meot et al. Correction factor of about 1.24 with a maximum uncertainty on present fitted model estimated to 11.6%. Latter value is extracted from a sensitivity analysis of the calculation route to the level density model that is selected for the non-equilibrated residual nucleus and to alternative choices we can make in terms of neutron fission cross section measurement references for the 238Pu and 239Pu target nuclei.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.