Paper detail

Querying for heavily obscured AGN via high 9.7 micron optical depths: results from the 12 micron, GOODS, and FLS Spitzer spectroscopic samples

To optimally identify candidates of the Compton-thick (CT) active galactic nuclei (AGN) that contribute to the unresolved X-ray background in infrared surveys, a tracer of column density is desirable in addition to an AGN indicator. In a recent study, we aimed to test whether the 9.7 micron silicate absorption feature can be used for this purpose when seen at high optical depths. We found that the extreme criterion of optical thickness at 9.7 micron is efficient in identifying CT objects among local AGN. Having identified six of the nine CT AGN in the 12 micron sample with Spitzer and X-ray spectra, we expanded this analysis at intermediate/high z, using all GOODS and FLS sources with Spitzer and X-ray observations. We found 12 sources with tau_9.7>1 that host an AGN between 0.8<z<2.7. Four of them are likely to be CT according to their low X-ray to 6 micron luminosity ratio. Surveys with complete coverage in both mid-infrared spectra and X-ray data can provide large populations of such sources, as at least 5-9% of all infrared bright galaxies in the GOODS and FLS samples are tau_9.7>1 AGN.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.