Paper detail

Quenching star formation in cluster galaxies

In order to understand the processes that quench star formation within rich clusters, we construct a library of subhalo orbits drawn from $Λ$CDM cosmological N-body simulations of four rich clusters. The orbits are combined with models of star formation followed by quenching in the cluster environment. These are compared with observed bulge and disc colours and stellar absorption linestrength indices of satellite galaxies. Models in which the bulge stellar populations depend only on the galaxy subhalo mass while the disc quenching depends on the cluster environment are acceptable fits to the data. An exponential disc quenching timescale of 3 - 3.5 Gyr is preferred. Models with short ($\lesssim 1$ Gyr) quenching timescales yield cluster-centric gradients in disc colours and Balmer line indices that are too steep compared to observations. We also examine models in which there is quenching in lower mass groups prior to cluster infall ("pre-processing"), finding that such models are a better fit to the data than models without pre-processing and require similar quenching times. The data slightly prefer models where quenching occurs only for galaxies falling within about 0.5 $r_{200}$. Finally, we have examined models with short quenching timescales of 1 Gyr, but a long delay time of 3 Gyr prior to quenching. All models with short quenching timescales, even such "delayed-then-rapid" quenching models, produce excessively red galaxies near the cluster core and are strongly disfavoured by the data. These results imply that the environments of rich clusters must impact star formation rates of infalling galaxies on relatively long timescales -- several times longer than a typical halo spends within the virial radius of a cluster. This scenario favours gentler quenching mechanisms such as slow "strangulation" over more rapid ram-pressure stripping.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.