Paper detail

Quaternionic $1-$factorizations and complete sets of rainbow spanning trees

A $1-$factorization of a complete graph on $2n$ vertices is said to be $G-$regular if it posseses an automorphism group $G$ acting sharply transitively on the vertex-set. The problem of determining which groups can realize such a situation dates back to a result by Hartman and Rosa (1985) on cyclic groups and, when $n$ is even, the problem is still open. An attempt to obtain a fairly precise description of groups and $1-$factorizations satisfying this symmetry constrain can be done by imposing further conditions. It was recently proved, see Rinaldi (2021) and Mazzuoccolo et al. (2019), that a $G-$regular $1-$factorization together with a complete set of rainbow spanning trees exists whenever $n$ is odd, while the existence for each $n$ even was proved when either $G$ is cyclic and $n$ is not a power of $2$, or when $G$ is a dihedral group. In this paper we extend this result and prove the existence also for other classes of groups.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.