Paper detail

Quasinormal Modes and Hawking Radiation Sparsity of GUP corrected Black Holes in Bumblebee Gravity with Topological Defects

We have obtained the Generalized Uncertainty Principle (GUP) corrected de Sitter and anti-de Sitter black hole solutions in bumblebee gravity with a topological defect. We have calculated the scalar, electromagnetic and gravitational quasinormal modes for the both vanishing and non-vanishing effective cosmological constant using Padé averaged sixth order WKB approximation method. Apart from this, the time evolutions for all three perturbations are studied, and quasinormal modes are calculated using the time domain profile. We found that the first order and second order GUP parameters $α$ and $β$, respectively have opposite impacts on the quasinormal modes. The study also finds that the presence of a global monopole can decrease the quasinormal frequencies and the decay rate significantly. On the other hand, Lorentz symmetry violation has noticeable impacts on the quasinormal frequencies and the decay rate. We have studied the greybody factors, power spectrum and sparsity of the black hole with the vanishing effective cosmological constant for all the three perturbations. The presence of Lorentz symmetry breaking and the GUP parameter $α$ decrease, while other GUP parameter $β$ and the presence of global monopole increase the probability of Hawking radiation to reach the spatial infinity. The presence of Lorentz violation can make the black holes less sparse, while the presence of a global monopole can increase the sparsity of the black holes. Moreover, we have seen that the black hole area quantization rule is modified by the presence of Lorentz symmetry breaking.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.