Paper detail

Quasi-stars, giants and the Schönberg-Chandrasekhar limit

The Schönberg-Chandrasekhar (SC) limit is a well-established result in the understanding of stellar evolution. It provides an estimate of the point at which an evolved isothermal core embedded in an extended envelope begins to contract. We investigate contours of constant fractional mass in terms of homology invariant variables U and V and find that the SC limit exists because the isothermal core solution does not intersect all the contours for an envelope with polytropic index 3. We find that this analysis also applies to similar limits in the literature including the inner mass limit for polytropic models of quasi-stars. Consequently, any core solution that does not intersect all the fractional mass contours exhibits an associated limit and we identify several relevant cases where this is so. We show that a composite polytrope is at a fractional core mass limit when its core solution touches but does not cross the contour of the corresponding fractional core mass. We apply this test to realistic models of helium stars and find that stars typically expand when their cores are near a mass limit. Furthermore, it appears that stars that evolve into giants have always first exceeded an SC-like limit.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.