Paper detail

Quasi-stars and the Schönberg-Chandrasekhar limit

The mechanism by which the supermassive black holes that power bright quasars at high redshift form remains unknown. One possibility is that ... the monolithic collapse of a massive protogalactic disc ... leads to the formation of a quasi-star: a growing black hole, initially of typical stellar-mass, embedded in a hydrostatic giant-like envelope. Quasi-stars are the main object of study in this dissertation. ... In Chapter 1, I introduce the problem posed by the supermassive black holes that power high-redshift quasars. ... In Chapter 2, I outline the Cambridge STARS code and the modifications that are made to model quasi-star envelopes. In Chapter 3, I present models of quasi-stars where the base of the envelope is located at the Bondi radius of the black hole. The black holes in these models are subject to a robust upper fractional mass limit of about one tenth. In addition, the final black hole mass is sensitive to the choice of the inner boundary radius of the envelope. In Chapter 4, I construct alternative models of quasi-stars by drawing from work on convection- and advection-dominated accretion flows ... The evolution of these quasi-stars is qualitatively different from those described in Chapter 3. ... [T]he core black holes are no longer subject to a fractional mass limit and ultimately accrete all of the material in their envelopes. In Chapter 5, I demonstrate that the fractional mass limit found in Chapter 3 ... is in essence the same as the Schönberg-Chandrasekhar limit. The analysis demonstrates ... that limits exist under a wider range of circumstances than previously thought. A test is provided that determines whether a composite polytrope is at a fractional mass limit. In Chapter 6, I apply this test to realistic stellar models and find evidence that the existence of fractional mass limits is connected to the evolution of stars into the red giants.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.