Paper detail

Quasi-separatrix layers and three-dimensional reconnection diagnostics for line-tied tearing modes

In three-dimensional magnetic configurations for a plasma in which no closed field line or magnetic null exists, no magnetic reconnection can occur, by the strictest definition of reconnection. A finitely long pinch with line-tied boundary conditions, in which all the magnetic field lines start at one end of the system and proceed to the opposite end, is an example of such a system. Nevertheless, for a long system of this type, the physical behavior in resistive magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) essentially involves reconnection. This has been explained in terms comparing the geometric and tearing widths [1, 2]. The concept of a quasi-separatrix layer[3, 4] was developed for such systems. In this paper we study a model for a line-tied system in which the corresponding periodic system has an unstable tearing mode. We analyze this system in terms of two magnetic field line diagnostics, the squashing factor[3-5] and the electrostatic potential difference used in kinematic reconnection studies[6, 7]. We discuss the physical and geometric significance of these two diagnostics and compare them in the context of discerning tearing-like behavior in line-tied modes. [1] G. L. Delzanno and J. M. Finn. Physics of Plasmas, 15(3):032904, 2008. [2] Y.-M. Huang and E. G. Zweibel. Physics of Plasmas, 16(4):042102, 2009. [3] E. R. Priest and P. Démoulin. J. Geophys. Res., 100(A12):23443-23463, 1995. [4] P. Démoulin, J. C. Henoux, E. R. Priest, and C. H. Mandrini. Astron. Astrophys., 308:643-655, Apr. 1996. [5] V. S. Titov and G. Hornig. Advances in Space Research, 29(7):1087-1092, 2002. [6] Y. Lau and J. M. Finn. The Astrophysical Journal, 350:672-691, Feb. 1990. [7] Y. Lau and J. M. Finn. The Astrophysical Journal, 366:577-591, 1991.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.