Paper detail

Quasi-normal modes in random media

We have analyzed spectra of localized microwave transmitted through quasi-1D random samples to obtain the central frequency, linewidth and field speckle pattern of the modes for an ensemble of samples at three lengths. We find strong correlation between modal field speckle patterns. This leads to destructive interference between modes which explain strong suppression of steady state transmission and of pulsed transmission at early times. We have also studied the statistics of mode spacings and widths in localized samples. The distribution of mode spacings between adjacent modes is close to the Wigner surmise predicted for diffusive waves, which exhibit strong level repulsion. However, a deviation from Wigner distribution can be seen in the distribution of spacings beyond the nearest ones. A weakening in the rigidity of the modal spectrum is also observed as the sample length increases because of reduced level repulsion for more strongly localized waves. In contrast to residual diffusive behavior for level spacing statistics, the distribution of level widths are log-normal as predicted for localized waves. We also measured the steady state and dynamic fluctuations and correlation of localized wave transmitted through random waveguides. We find the degree of intensity correlation first increases, and then decays with time delay, before increasing dramatically. The variation in the spatial correlation of intensity with time delay is due to the changing effective number of modes that contribute to transmission. A minimum in correlation is reached when the number of modes contributing appreciably to transmission peaks. At long times, the degree of intensity correlation and the variance of total transmission increase dramatically. This reflects the reduced role of short-lived states and the growing weight of long-lived modes.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.