Paper detail

Quasi-Monte Carlo point sets with small $t$-values and WAFOM

The $t$-value of a $(t, m, s)$-net is an important criterion of point sets for quasi-Monte Carlo integration, and many point sets are constructed in terms of the $t$-values, as this leads to small integration error bounds. Recently, Matsumoto, Saito, and Matoba proposed the Walsh figure of merit (WAFOM) as a quickly computable criterion of point sets that ensures higher order convergence for function classes of very high smoothness. In this paper, we consider a search algorithm for point sets whose $t$-value and WAFOM are both small, so as to be effective for a wider range of function classes. For this, we fix digital $(t, m, s)$-nets with small $t$-values (e.g., Sobol' or Niederreiter--Xing nets) in advance, apply random linear scrambling, and select scrambled digital $(t, m, s)$-nets in terms of WAFOM. Experiments show that the resulting point sets improve the rates of convergence for smooth functions and are robust for non-smooth functions.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.