Paper detail

Quasi-invariance of Gaussian measures of negative regularity for fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations

We consider the Cauchy problem for the fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation (FNLS) on the one-dimensional torus with cubic nonlinearity and high dispersion parameter $α> 1$, subject to a Gaussian random initial data of negative Sobolev regularity $σ<s-\frac{1}{2}$, for $s \le \frac 12$. We show that for all $s_{*}(α) <s\leq \frac{1}{2}$, the equation is almost surely globally well-posed. Moreover, the associated Gaussian measure supported on $H^{s}(\mathbb T)$ is quasi-invariant under the flow of the equation. For $α< \frac{1}{20}(17 + 3\sqrt{21}) \approx 1.537$, the regularity of the initial data is lower than the one provided by the deterministic well-posedness theory. We obtain this result by following the approach of DiPerna-Lions (1989); first showing global-in-time bounds for the solution of the infinite-dimensional Liouville equation for the transport of the Gaussian measure, and then transferring these bounds to the solution of the equation by adapting Bourgain's invariant measure argument to the quasi-invariance setting. This allows us to bootstrap almost sure global bounds for the solution of (FNLS) from its probabilistic local well-posedness theory.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.