Paper detail

Quasi-degenerate Neutrino mass models and their significance: A model independent investigation

The prediction of possible ordering of neutrino masses relies mostly on the model selected. Alienating the $μ-τ$ interchange symmetry from discrete flavour symmetry based models, turns the neutrino mass matrix less predictive. But this inspires one to seek the answer from other phenomenological frameworks. We need a proper parametrization of the neutrino mass matrices concerning individual hierarchies. In the present work, we attempt to study the six different cases of Quasi-degenerate (QDN) neutrino models. The related mass matrices, $m_{LL}^ν$ are parametrized with two free parameters ($α,η$) and standard Wolfenstein parameter ($λ$). The input mass scale $m_0$ is selected around $\sim 0.08\,eV$. We begin with a $μ-τ$ symmetric neutrino mass matrix tailed by a correction from charged lepton sector. The parametrization accentuates the existence of four independent texture zero building block matrices which are common to all the QDN models under $μ-τ$ symmetric framework. These remain invariant irrespective of any choice of solar angle. In our parametrization, the neutrino sector controls the solar angle, whereas the reactor and atmospheric angles are dictated by the charged lepton sector. In the framework of oscillation experiments, cosmological observation and future experiments involving $β$-decay and $0νββ$ experiments, all QDN models are tested and a reason to rule out anyone out of the six models is unfounded. A strong preference for $\sin^2θ_{12}=0.32$ is observed for QDNH-$Type A$ model.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.