Paper detail

Quasi-Cyclic Stern Proof of Knowledge

The ongoing NIST standardization process has shown that Proof of Knowledge (PoK) based signatures have become an important type of possible post-quantum signatures. Regarding code-based cryptography, the original approach for PoK based signatures is the Stern protocol which allows to prove the knowledge of a small weight vector solving a given instance of the Syndrome Decoding (SD) problem over F2. It features a soundness error equal to 2/3. This protocol was improved a few years later by Véron who proposed a variation of the scheme based on the General Syndrome Decoding (GSD) problem which leads to better results in term of communication. A few years later, the AGS protocol introduced a variation of the Véron protocol based on Quasi-Cyclic (QC) matrices. The AGS protocol permits to obtain an asymptotic soundness error of 1/2 and an improvement in term of communications. In the present paper, we introduce the Quasi-Cyclic Stern PoK which constitutes an adaptation of the AGS scheme in a SD context, as well as several new optimizations for code-based PoK. Our main optimization on the size of the signature can't be applied to GSD based protocols such as AGS and therefore motivated the design of our new protocol. In addition, we also provide a special soundness proof that is compatible with the use of the Fiat-Shamir transform for 5-round protocols. This approach is valid for our protocol but also for the AGS protocol which was lacking such a proof. We compare our results with existing signatures including the recent code-based signatures based on PoK leveraging the MPC in the head paradigm. In practice, our new protocol is as fast as AGS while reducing its associated signature length by 20%. As a consequence, it constitutes an interesting trade-off between signature length and execution time for the design of a code-based signature relying only on the difficulty of the SD problem.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.