Paper detail

Quasar photometric redshifts from incomplete data using Deep Learning

Forthcoming astronomical surveys are expected to detect new sources in such large numbers that measuring their spectroscopic redshift measurements will be not be practical. Thus, there is much interest in using machine learning to yield the redshift from the photometry of each object. We are particularly interested in radio sources (quasars) detected with the Square Kilometre Array and have found Deep Learning, trained upon a large optically-selected sample of quasi-stellar objects, to be effective in the prediction of the redshifts in three external samples of radio-selected sources. However, the requirement of nine different magnitudes, from the near-infrared, optical and ultra-violet bands, has the effect of significantly reducing the number of sources for which redshifts can be predicted. Here we explore the possibility of using machine learning to impute the missing features. We find that for the training sample, simple imputation is sufficient, particularly replacing the missing magnitude with the maximum for that band, thus presuming that the non-detection is at the sensitivity limit. For the test samples, however, this does not perform as well as multivariate imputation, which suggests that many of the missing magnitudes are not limits, but have indeed not been observed. From extensive testing of the models, we suggest that the imputation is best restricted to two missing values per source. Where the sources overlap on the sky, in the worst case, this increases the fraction of sources for which redshifts can be estimated from 46% to 80%, with >90% being reached for the other samples.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.