Paper detail

Quark number densities at imaginary chemical potential in $N_f=2$ lattice QCD with Wilson fermions and its model analyses

We investigate temperature ($T$) dependence of quark number densities ($n_q$) at imaginary and real chemical potential ($μ$) by using $N_f = 2$ lattice QCD and the hadron resonance gas (HRG) model. Quark number densities are calculated at imaginary $μ$ with lattice QCD on an $8^2 \times 16 \times 4$ lattice with the clover-improved $N_f =2$ Wilson fermion action and the renormalization-group-improved Iwasaki gauge action. The results are consistent with the previous results of the staggered-type quark action. The $n_q$ obtained are extrapolated to real $μ$ by assuming the Fourier series for the confinement region and the polynomial series for the deconfinement region. The extrapolated results are consistent with the previous results of the Taylor expansion method for the reweighting factor. The upper bound $(μ/T)_{\mathrm{max}}$ of the region where the extrapolation is considered to be reliable is estimated for each temperature $T$ . We test whether $T$ dependence of nucleon and $Δ$-resonance masses can be determined from LQCD data on $n_q$ at imaginary $μ$ by using the HRG model. In the test calculation, nucleon and $Δ$-resonance masses reduce by about 10% in the vicinity of the pseudocritical temperature.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.