Paper detail

Quantum violation of macrorealism under multi-outcome two-parameter generalised measurements

Generalised dichotomic quantum measurements are fully characterised by two real parameters, dubbed as sharpness parameter and biasedness parameter. The trade-off between the degree of joint measurability, sharpness and biasedness of generalised measurements was known in the case of pairs of qubit observables. In the present work we generalise the notion of sharpness and biasedness measure of multi-outcome generalised measurements pertaining to multilevel systems. A trade-off between the amount of quantum mechanical (QM) violation of macrorealism (MR), sharpness and biasedness is established. Specifically we found that the minimum value of sharpness parameter, above which the QM violations of different necessary conditions of MR persist, decreases with increase in biasedness. We also analysed the effect of biasedness parameter on the magnitudes of QM violations of different necessary conditions of MR for multilevel spin systems.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.