Paper detail

Quantum versus classical approach of dechanneling and incoherent electromagnetic processes in aligned crystals

Particles traveling in aligned crystals at small angles w.r.t. crystallographic axes or planes are principally steered by the continuous Lindhard potential. This interaction conserves the energy E, the longitudinal momentum p_parallel, the transverse energy of the particle E_perp and is elastic concerning the crystal quantum state. At high enough energy the particle motion is quasi-classical. The time-dependent fluctuations of the positions of the atoms or of the electrons of the crystal create a residual potential, on which the particle can scatter. This interaction does not conserve the previous quantities and is inelastic for the crystal. We compare its treatments with the classical binary collision model and with a phenomenological quantum model. The classical dechanneling rate is estimated to be several ten per cent larger than the quantum one. The influence of correlated vibrations of neighboring atoms is discussed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.