Paper detail

Quantum Vavilov-Cherenkov radiation from shearing two transparent dielectric plates

Using a fully relativistic theory we study the quantum Vavilov-Cherenkov radiation and quantum friction occurring during relative sliding of the two transparent dielectric plates with the refractive index $n$. These phenomena occur above the threshold velocity $v_c=2nc/(n^2+1)$. Close to the threshold velocity they are dominated by the contribution from $s$--polarized electromagnetic waves, which agrees with the approximate (relativistic) theory by Pendry (J. Mod. Opt. \textbf{45}, 2389 (1998)). However, in the ultra relativistic case ($v\rightarrow c$), the contributions from both polarisations are strongly enhanced in the comparison with the approximate theory, and a new contribution occurs from the mixing of the electromagnetic waves with the different polarization. The numerical results are supplemented by an analytical treatment close to the threshold velocity and the light velocity.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.