Paper detail

Quantum Travel Time and Tunnel Ionization Times of Atoms

Time it takes to travel from one position to another, devoid of any quantum mechanical description, has been modeled variously, especially for quantum tunneling. The model time, if universally valid, must be subluminal, must hold everywhere (inside and outside the tunneling region), must comprise interference effects, and must have a sensible classical limit. Here we show that the quantum travel time, hypothesized to emerge with the state vector, is a function of the probability density and probability current such that all the criteria above are fulfilled. We compute it inside and outside a rectangular potential barrier and find physically sensible results. Moreover, we contrast it with recent ionization time measurements of the $\rm He$ as well as the $\rm Ar$ and $\rm Kr$ atoms, and find good agreement with data. The quantum travel time holds good for stationary systems, and can have applications in numerous tunneling-driven phenomena.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.