Paper detail

Quantum steering and quantum discord under noisy channels and entanglement swapping

Quantum entanglement, discord, and EPR-steering are properties which are considered as valuable resources for fuelling quantum information-theoretic protocols. EPR-steering is a property that is more general than Bell-nonlocality and yet more restrictive than entanglement. Quantum discord on the other hand, captures non-classical behaviour beyond that of entanglement, and its study has remained of active research interest during the past two decades. Exploring the behaviour of these quantum properties in different physical scenarios, like those simulated by open quantum systems, is therefore of crucial importance for understanding their viability for quantum technologies. In this work, we analyse the behaviour of EPR-steering, entanglement, and quantum discord, for two-qubit states under various quantum processes. First, we consider the three noisy channel scenarios of; phase damping, generalised amplitude damping and stochastic dephasing channel. Second, we explore the behaviour of these quantum properties in an entanglement swapping scenario. We quantify EPR-steering by means of an inequality with three-input two-output measurement settings, and address quantum discord as the interferometric power of quantum states. Our findings are the following. First, we show that some of the relatively straightforward noisy channels here considered, can induce non-trivial dynamics such as sudden death as well as death and revival of EPR-steering and entanglement. Second, we find that although noisy channels in general reduce the amount of correlations present in the system, the swapping protocol on the other hand displays scenarios where these quantum correlations can be enhanced. These results therefore illustrate that quantum processes do not exclusively affect the quantum properties of physical systems in a negative manner, but that they can also have positive effects on such properties.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.