Paper detail

Quantum Spectrum Testing

In this work, we study the problem of testing properties of the spectrum of a mixed quantum state. Here one is given $n$ copies of a mixed state $ρ\in\mathbb{C}^{d\times d}$ and the goal is to distinguish whether $ρ$'s spectrum satisfies some property $\mathcal{P}$ or is at least $ε$-far in $\ell_1$-distance from satisfying $\mathcal{P}$. This problem was promoted in the survey of Montanaro and de Wolf under the name of testing unitarily invariant properties of mixed states. It is the natural quantum analogue of the classical problem of testing symmetric properties of probability distributions. Here, the hope is for algorithms with subquadratic copy complexity in the dimension $d$. This is because the "empirical Young diagram (EYD) algorithm" can estimate the spectrum of a mixed state up to $ε$-accuracy using only $\widetilde{O}(d^2/ε^2)$ copies. In this work, we show that given a mixed state $ρ\in\mathbb{C}^{d\times d}$: (i) $Θ(d/ε^2)$ copies are necessary and sufficient to test whether $ρ$ is the maximally mixed state, i.e., has spectrum $(\frac1d, ..., \frac1d)$; (ii) $Θ(r^2/ε)$ copies are necessary and sufficient to test with one-sided error whether $ρ$ has rank $r$, i.e., has at most $r$ nonzero eigenvalues; (iii) $\widetildeΘ(r^2/Δ)$ copies are necessary and sufficient to distinguish whether $ρ$ is maximally mixed on an $r$-dimensional or an $(r+Δ)$-dimensional subspace; and (iv) The EYD algorithm requires $Ω(d^2/ε^2)$ copies to estimate the spectrum of $ρ$ up to $ε$-accuracy, nearly matching the known upper bound. In addition, we simplify part of the proof of the upper bound. Our techniques involve the asymptotic representation theory of the symmetric group; in particular Kerov's algebra of polynomial functions on Young diagrams.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.