Paper detail

Quantum Size Effect Exponential Heat Capacity in 4 nm Natural Nickel Nanolattice

Quantum size effect-induced heat capacity of metal nanoparticles at low temperatures was predicted 79 years ago to be exponential. This, however, has not been reported until date. In defiance, we demonstrate here observation of exponentially decaying heat capacity, below 45.2 K, associated with quantum jumps, exceptionally in 4 nm naturally assembled hexagonal closed packed (hcp) lattice of nickel nanoparticles; high magnetic fields have negligible effect on these features. Magnetic susceptibilities in contrast reveal evolution of quantum size effects with decrease in particle size. They exhibit sharp rise below about 30 K and vestiges of saturations below 5 K. The former is explained by Curie-like characteristics of odd electrons while the latter tend towards the orthogonal even-like case. These characteristics, ascribed to the ensembles of Ni nanoparticles, will give a new direction in understanding this crucial thermodynamic phenome-non.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.