Paper detail

Quantum Query Complexity of Dyck Languages with Bounded Height

We consider the problem of determining if a sequence of parentheses is well parenthesized, with a depth of at most h. We denote this language as $Dyck_h$. We study the quantum query complexity of this problem for different h as function of the length n of the word. It has been known from a recent paper by Aaronson et al. that, for any constant h, since $Dyck_h$ is star-free, it has quantum query complexity $\tildeΘ(\sqrt{n})$, where the hidden logarithm factors in $\tildeΘ$ depend on h. Their proof does not give rise to an algorithm. When h is not a constant, $Dyck_h$ is not even context-free. We give an algorithm with $O\left(\sqrt{n}\log(n)^{0.5h}\right)$ quantum queries for $Dyck_h$ for all h. This is better than the trival upper bound $n$ when $h=o(\frac{\log(n)}{\log\log n})$. We also obtain lower bounds: we show that for every $0<ε\leq 0.37$, there exists $c>0$ such that $Q(\text{Dyck}_{c\log(n)}(n))=Ω(n^{1-ε})$. When $h=ω(\log(n))$, the quantum query complexity is close to $n$, i.e. $Q(\text{Dyck}_h(n))=ω(n^{1-ε})$ for all $ε>0$. Furthermore when $h=Ω(n^ε)$ for some $ε>0$, $Q(\text{Dyck}_{h}(n))=Θ(n)$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.