Paper detail

Quantum nonlinear spectroscopy of single nuclear spins

Nonlinear spectroscopy is widely used for studying physical systems. Conventional nonlinear optical spectroscopy and magnetic resonance spectroscopy, which use classical probes such as electromagnetic waves, can only access certain types of correlations in a quantum system. The idea of quantum nonlinear spectroscopy was recently proposed to use quantum probes such as entangled photons to achieve sensitivities and resolutions beyond the classical limits. It is shown that quantum sensing can extract arbitrary types and orders of correlations in a quantum system by first quantum-entangling a sensor and the object and then measuring the sensor. Quantum sensing has been applied to achieve nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) of single atoms and the second-order correlation spectroscopy has been adopted to enhance the spectral resolution. However, quantum nonlinear spectroscopy (i.e., the measurement of higher-order correlations) of single nuclear spins is still elusive. Here we demonstrate the extraction of fourth-order correlations of single nuclear spins that cannot be measured in conventional nonlinear spectroscopy, using sequential weak measurement via an atomic quantum sensor, namely, a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond. We show that the quantum nonlinear spectroscopy provides fingerprint features to identify different types of objects, such as Gaussian noises, random-phased AC fields, and quantum spins, which would be indistinguishable in second-order correlations. The measured fourth-order correlation unambiguously differentiates a single nuclear spin and a random-phased AC field. This work constitutes an initial step toward the application of higher-order correlations to quantum sensing, to examining the quantum foundation (by, e.g., higher-order Leggett-Garg inequality), and to studying quantum many-body physics.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.