Paper detail

Quantum Collapse of a Thin Shell Revisited

There are several possible choices of the time parameter for the canonical description of a self-gravitating thin shell, but quantum thories built on different time parameters lead to unitarily inequivalent descriptions. We compare the quantum collapse of a thin dust shell in two different times {\it viz.,} the time coordinate in the interior of the shell (originally addressed in \cite{hajicek92a}) and the time coordinate of the comoving observer (proper time). In each case, we obtain exact solutions to the Wheeler-DeWitt equation requiring only a finite and well behaved $U(1)$ current. The two quantum theories are complementary and each highlights the role played by the Planck mass: stationary states of positive energy in interior time exist only if the shell rest mass in smaller than the Planck mass. In proper time they exist only when the shell rest mass is {\it greater} than the Planck mass. In coordinate time there are both scattering states and bound states with a well defined energy spectrum. In the proper time description there are only bound states, whose spectrum we determine.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.