Paper detail

Quantum breaking of ergodicity in semi-classical charge transfer dynamics

Does electron transfer (ET) kinetics within a single-electron trajectory description always coincide with the ensemble description? This fundamental question of ergodic behavior is scrutinized within a very basic semi-classical curve-crossing problem of quantum Landau-Zener tunneling between two electronic states with overdamped classical reaction coordinate. It is shown that in the limit of non-adiabatic electron transfer (weak tunneling) well-described by the Marcus-Levich-Dogonadze (MLD) rate the answer is yes. However, in the limit of the so-called solvent-controlled adiabatic electron transfer a profound breaking of ergodicity occurs. The ensemble survival probability remains nearly exponential with the inverse rate given by the sum of the adiabatic curve crossing (Kramers) time and inverse MLD rate. However, near to adiabatic regime, the single-electron survival probability is clearly non-exponential but possesses an exponential tail which agrees well with the ensemble description. Paradoxically, the mean transfer time in this classical on the ensemble level regime is well described by the inverse of nonadiabatic quantum tunneling rate on a single particle level.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.