Paper detail

Quantum annealing with capacitive-shunted flux qubits

Quantum annealing (QA) provides us with a way to solve combinatorial optimization problems. In the previous demonstration of the QA, a superconducting flux qubit (FQ) was used. However, the flux qubits in these demonstrations have a short coherence time such as tens of nano seconds. For the purpose to utilize quantum properties, it is necessary to use another qubit with a better coherence time. Here, we propose to use a capacitive-shunted flux qubit (CSFQ) for the implementation of the QA. The CSFQ has a few order of magnitude better coherence time than the FQ used in the QA. We theoretically show that, although it is difficult to perform the conventional QA with the CSFQ due to the form and strength of the interaction between the CSFQs, a spin-lock based QA can be implemented with the CSFQ even with the current technology. Our results pave the way for the realization of the practical QA that exploits quantum advantage with long-lived qubits.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.