Paper detail

Quantum annealing for hard 2-SAT problems : Distribution and scaling of minimum energy gap and success probability

In recent years, quantum annealing has gained the status of being a promising candidate for solving various optimization problems. Using a set of hard 2-satisfiabilty (2-SAT) problems, consisting of upto 18-variables problems, we analyze the scaling complexity of the quantum annealing algorithm and study the distributions of the minimum energy gap and the success probability. We extend the analysis of the standard quantum annealing Hamiltonian by introducing an additional term, the trigger Hamiltonian, which can be of two types : ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic. We use these trigger Hamiltonians to study their influence on the success probability for solving the selected 2-SAT problems. We found that although the scaling of the run-time is exponential for the standard and modified quantum annealing Hamiltonians, the scaling constant in case of adding the trigger Hamiltonians can be significantly smaller. Furthermore, certain choices for the trigger Hamiltonian and annealing times can result in a better scaling than that for simulated annealing. Lastly, we also use the quantum annealers of D-Wave Systems Inc. to study their performance in solving the 2-SAT problems and compare it with the simulation results.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.