Paper detail

Quantum Amplitudes in Black-Hole Evaporation: Complex Approach and Spin-0 Amplitude

We consider the quantum-mechanical decay of a Schwarzschild-like black hole formed by gravitational collapse into almost-flat space-time and weak radiation at a late time. We evaluate quantum amplitudes (not just probabilities) for transitions from initial to final states, and show that no information is lost in collapse to a black hole. Boundary data for the gravitational field and a scalar field are posed on an initial space-like hypersurface $Σ_I$ and a final surface $Σ_F$. These asymptotically-flat 3-surfaces are separated by a Lorentzian proper-time interval $T$, measured at spatial infinity. The boundary-value problem is made well-posed, classically and quantum-mechanically, by rotating $T$ into the lower-half complex plane: $T\to {\mid}T{\mid}\exp(-iθ), 0<θ\leqπ/2$. This corresponds to Feynman&#39;s $+iε$ prescription. For the classical boundary-value problem, we calculate the second-variation classical Lorentzian action $S^{(2)}_{class}$ as a functional of the boundary data. Following Feynman, the Lorentzian quantum amplitude is recovered in the limit $θ\to 0_{+}$ from the well-defined complex-$T$ amplitude. Dirac&#39;s canonical approach to the quantisation of constrained systems shows that for locally-supersymmetric theories of gravity the amplitude is exactly semi-classical: $\exp(i S^{(2)}_{class})$ for weak perturbations, apart from delta-functionals of the supersymmetry constraints. We treat such quantum amplitudes for weak scalar-field configurations on $Σ_F$, taking the weak final gravitational field to be spherically symmetric. The treatment involves adiabatic solutions of the scalar wave equation. This extends our previous work, giving explicit expressions for the real and imaginary parts of such quantum amplitudes.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.