Paper detail

Quantized slow blow up dynamics for the corotational energy critical harmonic heat flow

We consider the energy critical harmonic heat flow from $\Bbb R^2$ into a smooth compact revolution surface of $\Bbb R^3$. For initial data with corotational symmetry, the evolution reduces to the semilinear radially symmetric parabolic problem $$\partial_t u -\pa^2_{r} u-\frac{\pa_r u}{r} + \frac{f(u)}{r^2}=0$$ for a suitable class of functions $f$ . Given an integer $L\in \Bbb N^*$, we exhibit a set of initial data arbitrarily close to the least energy harmonic map $Q$ in the energy critical topology such that the corresponding solution blows up in finite time by concentrating its energy $$\nabla u(t,r)-\nabla Q(\frac{r}{ł(t)})\to u^* in L^2$$ at a speed given by the {\it quantized} rates: $$ł(t)=c(u_0)(1+o(1))\frac{(T-t)^L}{|\log (T-t)|^{\frac{2L}{2L-1}}},$$ in accordance with the formal predictions [3]. The case L=1 corresponds to the stable regime exhibited in [37], and the data for $L\ge 2$ leave on a manifold of codimension $(L-1)$ in some weak sense. Our analysis lies in the continuation of [36,32,37] by further exhibiting the mechanism for the existence of the excited slow blow up rates and the associated instability of these threshold dynamics.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.