Paper detail

Quantization of Bianchi Models in N=1 Supergravity with a Cosmological Constant

We study the quantization of some cosmological models within the theory of N=1 supergravity with a positive cosmological constant. We find, by imposing the supersymmetry and Lorentz constraints, that there are no physical states in the models we have considered. For the k=1 Friedmann-Robertson-Walker model, where the fermionic degrees of freedom of the gravitino field are very restricted, we have found two bosonic quantum physical states, namely the wormhole and the Hartle-Hawking state. From the point of view of perturbation theory, it seems that the gravitational and gravitino modes that are allowed to be excited in a supersymmetric Bianchi-IX model contribute in such a way to forbid any physical solutions of the quantum constraints. This suggests that in a complete perturbation expansion we would have to conclude that the full theory of N=1 supergravity with a non-zero cosmological constant should have no physical states.

preprint1994arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.